Birth Technologies: Prenatal Diagnosis and Abortion Policy
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Politics and the Life Sciences
- Vol. 12 (1) , 31-44
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0730938400011229
Abstract
This study of “birth technologies” such as amniocentesis and ultrasound explores their relationship to law in a correlative area, abortion politics, in order to assess the indirect influence of politics on technology. We begin nearly twenty years ago when these technologies were emerging and trace the story to the early 1990s. Our analysis suggests that abortion politics, filtered through such activities as grant-making and basic research, influenced the development of these technologies. We therefore propose a model of policy that includes both the relatively independent march of scientific research and technical applications and the operation of constraining forces, like political interests, on science and technique. Here, law is a vehicle that itself becomes illuminated as both politics and substance.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abortion and the Politics of MotherhoodPublished by University of California Press ,2019
- Can a Pregnant Woman Morally Refuse Fetal Surgery?California Law Review, 1991
- The Supreme Court, Privacy, and AbortionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Safety and Efficacy of Chorionic Villus Sampling for Early Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenetic AbnormalitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Genetic counseling — the postcounseling period: I. Parents' perceptions of uncertaintyAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1979
- Biomedical Ethics and the LawPublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- MYCOBACTERIAL LYMPHADENITISThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1975
- Overseas AdvertisementBMJ, 1975
- Problems behind the Promise: Ethical Issues in Mass Genetic ScreeningHastings Center Report, 1972