Phase II Trial of Cetuximab in Patients With Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
- 20 November 2006
- journal article
- lung cancer
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (33) , 5253-5258
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.2263
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of cetuximab in patients with recurrent or progressive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after receiving at least one prior chemotherapy regimen.Patients and Methods: This was an open-label, phase II study of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) –positive and EGFR-negative advanced NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1. Patients received cetuximab 400 mg/m2intravenously (IV) during 120 minutes on week 1 followed by weekly doses of cetuximab 250 mg/m2IV during 60 minutes. A cycle was considered as 4 weeks of treatment and therapy was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary end point was to assess response rate. Secondary end points included an estimation of time to progression and survival.Results: Patient and disease characteristics (n = 66) included EGFR-positive status (n = 60); EGFR-negative status (n = 6); number of prior regimens (one, n = 28; two, n = 27; ≥ three, n = 11); male (n = 41); female (n = 25); adenocarcinoma (n = 36); and smoking status (never, n = 13; former, n = 45; current, n = 8). Grade 3/4 toxicities included acne-like rash (6.1%), anaphylactic reactions (1.5%), and diarrhea (1.5%). The response rate for all patients (n = 66) was 4.5% (95% CI, 0.9% to 12.7%) and the stable disease rate was 30.3% (95% CI, 19.6% to 42.9%). The response rate for patients with EGFR-positive tumors (n = 60) was 5% (95% CI, 1.0% to 13.9%). The median time to progression for all patients was 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6 months) and median survival time was 8.9 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 12.6 months).Conclusion: Although the response rate with single-agent cetuximab in this heavily pretreated patient population with advanced NSCLC was only 4.5%, the disease control rates and overall survival seem comparable to that of pemetrexed, docetaxel, and erlotinib in similar groups of patients.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multicenter Phase I/II Study of Cetuximab With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Untreated Patients With Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer)The Lancet, 2005
- Differential Effects of Gefitinib and Cetuximab on Non–small-cell Lung Cancers Bearing Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor MutationsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Combined Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting with the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Gefitinib (ZD1839) and the Monoclonal Antibody Cetuximab (IMC-C225)Clinical Cancer Research, 2004
- Dual-Agent Molecular Targeting of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)Cancer Research, 2004
- EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib TherapyScience, 2004
- Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to GefitinibNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- O-5 Multiple regression analysis of prognostic variables for survival from the phase III study of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Lung Cancer, 2003
- GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASESAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1988