The structural basis for agonist and partial agonist action on a β1-adrenergic receptor

Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Abstract
Two papers by Brian Kobilka and colleagues describe the X-ray crystal structure of the human β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) bound to various agonists. β2AR is a member of the G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family of membrane-spanning receptors that sense molecules outside the cell and activate internal signalling pathways. With a ubiquitous role in human physiology, GPCRs are prime targets for drug discovery. A third paper by Christopher Tate and his team describes crystal structures of a similar GPCR, the turkey β1-adrenergic receptor (β1AR), bound to full and partial agonists. Together, these new structures reveal the subtle structural changes that accompany agonist binding, showing how binding events inside and outside the cell membrane stabilize the receptor's active state. Agonist binding to β1AR is shown to induce a contraction of the catecholamine-binding pocket relative to the antagonist-bound receptor, and molecular-dynamics simulations of the β2AR agonist complex suggest that the agonist-bound active state spontaneously relaxes to an inactive-like state in the absence of a G protein. Here, the X-ray crystal structure of the β1 adrenergic receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor, bound to four small molecules that either act as full agonists or partial agonists is solved. The structures show that agonist binding induces a contraction of the catecholamine-binding pocket relative to the antagonist-bound receptor. This work reveals the pharmacological differences between different ligand classes, which should facilitate the structure-based design of new drugs with predictable efficacies. β-adrenergic receptors (βARs) are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that activate intracellular G proteins upon binding catecholamine agonist ligands such as adrenaline and noradrenaline1,2. Synthetic ligands have been developed that either activate or inhibit βARs for the treatment of asthma, hypertension or cardiac dysfunction. These ligands are classified as either full agonists, partial agonists or antagonists, depending on whether the cellular response is similar to that of the native ligand, reduced or inhibited, respectively. However, the structural basis for these different ligand efficacies is unknown. Here we present four crystal structures of the thermostabilized turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) β1-adrenergic receptor (β1AR-m23) bound to the full agonists carmoterol and isoprenaline and the partial agonists salbutamol and dobutamine. In each case, agonist binding induces a 1 Å contraction of the catecholamine-binding pocket relative to the antagonist bound receptor. Full agonists can form hydrogen bonds with two conserved serine residues in transmembrane helix 5 (Ser5.42 and Ser5.46), but partial agonists only interact with Ser5.42 (superscripts refer to Ballesteros–Weinstein numbering3). The structures provide an understanding of the pharmacological differences between different ligand classes, illuminating how GPCRs function and providing a solid foundation for the structure-based design of novel ligands with predictable efficacies.