HILL‐CLIMBING BY PIGEONS

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Pigeons were exposed to two types of concurrent operant‐reinforcement schedules in order to determine what choice rules determine behavior on these schedules. In the first set of experiments, concurrent variable‐interval, variable‐interval schedules, key‐peck responses to either of two alternative schedules produced food reinforcement after a random time interval. The frequency of food‐reinforcement availability for the two schedules was varied over different ranges for different birds. In the second series of experiments, concurrent variable‐ratio, variable‐interval schedules, key‐peck responses to one schedule produced food reinforcement after a random time interval, whereas food reinforcement occurred for an alternative schedule only after a random number of responses. Results from both experiments showed that pigeons consistently follow a behavioral strategy in which the alternative schedule chosen at any time is the one which offers the highest momentary reinforcement probability (momentary maximizing). The quality of momentary maximizing was somewhat higher and more consistent when both alternative reinforcement schedules were time‐based than when one schedule was time‐based and the alternative response‐count based. Previous attempts to provide evidence for the existence of momentary maximizing were shown to be based upon faulty assumptions about the behavior implied by momentary maximizing and resultant inappropriate measures of behavior.

This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit: