Does conditioned nausea mediate drug-induced conditioned taste aversion?
- 1 November 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 78 (3) , 277-281
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00428165
Abstract
Two antiemetic drugs were tested on the expression of taste aversions previously conditioned in rats with lithium, amphetamine or morphine. Neither prochlorperazine nor scopolamine administered prior to testing attenuated established aversions, although both drugs are known to have antiemetic effects in other species. Negative findings were obtained with a range of doses of prochlorperazine and scopolamine, with strong and weak aversions, with one- and two-stimulus tests, in a repeated one-stimulus extinction procedure, with between- and within-group designs and with hooded, albino, male and female rats. The results do not support the widely accepted hypothesis that conditioned nausea mediates conditioned taste aversion.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morphine conditioned taste aversion revered by periaqueductal gray lesionsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1981
- Vagotomy facilitates extinction of conditioned taste aversions in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1981
- Learned taste aversions in humansPhysiology & Behavior, 1980
- Aversive stimulus properties of drugsNeuropharmacology, 1979
- Developmental changes in amphetamine-induced taste aversionsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1979
- Nitrous oxide-induced conditioned taste aversions in rats: The role of duration of drug exposure and its relation to the taste aversion-self-administration “paradox”Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1978
- Stereospecific aversive property of narcotic antagonists in morphine-free ratsLife Sciences, 1978
- Area postrema: Chemoreceptor trigger zone for vomiting - is that all?Life Sciences, 1974
- Area postrema damage and bait shyness.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973
- Conditioned taste aversions: Two-stimulus tests are more sensitive than one-stimulus testsBehavior Research Methods, 1971