Randomization, balance, and the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation methods
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
- Vol. 94 (1) , 97-119
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00228-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing for baseline balance in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- The value of randomization and control in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributionsBiometrika, 1992
- Statistics and Causal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity ScoreThe American Statistician, 1985
- A program for balancing the allocation of subjects to treatment in a clinical trialComputers and Biomedical Research, 1982
- Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of RandomizationThe Annals of Statistics, 1978
- The role of prognostic stratification in preventing the bias permitted by random allocation of treatmentJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1976
- Experimental Randomization: Who Needs It?The American Statistician, 1975
- Nearly Optimal Allocation of Experimental Units Using Observed Covariate ValuesTechnometrics, 1974