Il principe and lo stato
- 1 January 1957
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Studies in the Renaissance
- Vol. 4, 113-138
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2857143
Abstract
A scholar who has given much of his life to the study of Machiavelli and Machiavellianism, Prof. Giuseppe Prezzolini, recently observed that Machiavelli himself is partly responsible for the weird interpretations of which he has been victim, ‘because he did not take pains to express himself in a systematic form and with a coherent vocabulary. His way of writing is cited in the history of Itahan literature for its perspicuity, simplicity, absence of rhetoric. But it could not be cited for its precision … Machiavelli uses the same word for different concepts and expresses the same concepts with different words.' Prezzolini offers confirmation for his remarks from the corroborative reports of other explorers who wore themselves out slogging through the swamp of Machiavelli's vocabulary.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Machiavelli's Idea of VirtuRenaissance News, 1951
- Machiavellis Geschichtsauffassung und sein Begriff virtùPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1912