Spatial heterogeneity in aeolian erodibility: Uniform, topographic, geomorphic, and hydrologic hypotheses
Open Access
- 9 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 108 (D17)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003039
Abstract
Soil aeolian erodibility is the efficiency with which soil produces dust for a given meteorological forcing. Quantifying soil erodibility is crucial for forecasting dust events and the climatological distribution and forcing of dust. We use long‐term station observations and satellite indices of mineral dust to ascertain the role of regional topography, geomorphology, and hydrology in controlling sediment availability and erodibility. Our null hypothesis is that soil erodibility is globally uniform, so that emissions are determined by instantaneous local meteorology, vegetation, and soil moisture. We describe and quantify three competing hypotheses on regional processes which may affect local soil erodibility: (1) Erodibility is characterized by the relative elevation of source regions in surrounding basins. (2) Erodibility is characterized by the upstream area from which sediments may have accumulated locally through all climate regimes. (3) Erodibility is characterized by the local present‐day surface runoff. These hypotheses are tested in 3‐year simulations of the global Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model. All three spatially varying erodibility hypotheses produce significantly better agreement with station and satellite data than the null (Uniform) hypothesis. The Uniform hypothesis explains none of the spatial structure of emissions in Australia. Heterogeneous erodibility may explain up to 15–20%, 15–20%, and 50% more of the spatial structure of dust emissions than Uniform erodibility in the Sahara+Arabian Peninsula, East Asia, and Australia, respectively. The Geomorphic erodibility hypothesis performs best overall, but results vary by region and by metric. These results support the hypothesis that dust emission “hot spots” exist in regions where alluvial sediments have accumulated and may be disturbed. Our physically based erodibility hypotheses help explain dust observations in some regions, particularly East Asia, and can be used to help discriminate between natural and anthropogenic soil emissions.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensitivity study of meteorological parameters on mineral aerosol mobilization, transport, and distributionJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003
- Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model: Description and 1990s dust climatologyJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003
- Understanding the 30‐year Barbados desert dust recordJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2002
- ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF GLOBAL SOURCES OF ATMOSPHERIC SOIL DUST IDENTIFIED WITH THE NIMBUS 7 TOTAL OZONE MAPPING SPECTROMETER (TOMS) ABSORBING AEROSOL PRODUCTReviews of Geophysics, 2002
- Detection of mineral dust over the North Atlantic Ocean and Africa with the Nimbus 7 TOMSJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999
- Comparisons of the TOMS aerosol index with Sun‐photometer aerosol optical thickness: Results and applicationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999
- Five‐minute, 1/2°, and 1° data sets of continental watersheds and river networks for use in regional and global hydrologic and climate system modeling studiesWater Resources Research, 1999
- Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation: Theoretical basisJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- Contribution of different aerosol species to the global aerosol extinction optical thickness: Estimates from model resultsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997
- Global distribution of UV‐absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS dataJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997