Impact of chemotherapy beyond the first line in patients with metastatic breast cancer
- 23 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 107 (2) , 275-279
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9550-7
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine which benefit could be brought by the succession of chemotherapy lines in patients treated for metastatic breast cancer and to identify patients who benefit from these treatments. Nine hundred and thirty four patients with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 1992 and 2002 were studied. A total of 772, 505, 283, 127 and 55 patients received a first, second, third, fourth and fifth line of chemotherapy, respectively. The evaluation of benefit in each chemotherapy lines was based on time of disease control (TDC). TDC is defined as time between the date of the beginning of treatment and the date of progression of disease or death. In case of early progressive disease or progression diagnosed at the first evaluation, TDC value is zero. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors that could influence the TDC in each line of chemotherapy. Medians duration of TDC are 9.3 [0–120], 5.9 [0–83.6], 4.63 [0–37.2], 4.1 [0–36.7] and 0.23 months [0–15] in first, second, third, fourth and fifth lines, respectively. More interestingly, TDC was longer than 6 months in 50.5% of patients treated with second line, 40% with third line, 35% with fourth line and 23.5% with fifth line. These results justify the therapeutic succession of chemotherapy lines in metastatic breast cancer. Only one factor influences the duration of TDC for each line of treatment: duration of TDC observed in the previous line.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Breast Cancer With Synchronous Metastases: Trends in Survival During a 14-Year PeriodJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Sequential With Concomitant Administration of Doxorubicin and Docetaxel As First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM-9903) Phase III StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Is breast cancer survival improving?Cancer, 2003
- Docetaxel and Doxorubicin Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and the Combination of Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel as Front-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Intergroup Trial (E1193)Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000International Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Versus Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Multicenter TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Cytotoxic and hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of published randomized trials involving 31,510 women.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Chemotherapy and survival in advanced breast cancer: the inclusion of doxorubicin in Cooper type regimensBritish Journal of Cancer, 1993