Reasoning in a Jury Trial: The Influence of Instructions
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of General Psychology
- Vol. 114 (2) , 129-133
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1987.9711063
Abstract
The influence of timing and frequency of instructions on the reasoning of jurors in a simulated grand larceny trial was investigated. Mock jurors were given definitions of grand larceny before and after the testimony, only before, only after, or not at all. Although timing of instructions was not significantly related to reasoning or to verdicts, frequency of instructions influenced the aspects of testimony deemed relevant and increased juror use of legal rules in making verdicts. Selective encoding of testimony could not account for the instruction effect.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Psychology of LawAnnual Review of Psychology, 1982
- On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspectiveJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978
- Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978
- Effects of a defendant's previous psychiatric hospitalization on the judgments of simulated jurorsAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 1976