Twins as a natural experiment to study the causes of mild language delay: I: Design; twin–singleton differences in language, and obstetric risks
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Vol. 44 (3) , 326-341
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00125
Abstract
Background: Twins tend to lag behind singletons in their language development, but the causes were unknown. The possibilities suggested include obstetric complications, twin‐specific features, and postnatal differences in family interaction. The present study was designed to pit these alternatives against one another as possible causal influences. Method: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) was used to identify the 116 twin pairs (of whom 96 participated) and 114 pairs of singletons (of whom 98 participated) whose ages were no more than 30 months apart. The McArthur Communicative Development Inventory was completed at 20 months, and the Pre‐School Language Scales (PLS‐3), and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities at 36 months. Obstetric and perinatal complications were assessed on the basis of detailed systematic parental reports, together with a systematic coded abstraction of all medical records dealing with pregnancy and the neonatal period. Family background details were assessed from parental reports, and the primary carer's verbal functioning was assessed by the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale. Congenital anomalies were assessed using the method of Waldrop and Halverson. Results: The language of twins was 1.7 months below that of singletons at 20 months and 3.1 months at 3 years. The verbal cognitive score of twins was about half a standard deviation lower than that of singletons. The twin–singleton differences in language level were found to be unassociated with obstetric/perinatal features as assessed from both parental reports and medical records, to birthweight or gestation, to birthweight discrepancy within the twin pair, or to congenital anomalies. Conclusions: It is concluded that obstetric/perinatal features do not account for the slower language development in twins as compared with singletons, within a sample born after at least 33 weeks gestation.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence and developmental course of ‘secret language’International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2001
- Testing hypotheses on specific environmental causal effects on behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 2001
- Genetics and Child Psychiatry: I Advances in Quantitative and Molecular GeneticsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1999
- Behavior-state matching and synchrony in mother-infant interactions of nondepressed versus depressed dyads.Developmental Psychology, 1990
- Face-to-face interactions of postpartum depressed and nondepressed mother-infant pairs at 2 months.Developmental Psychology, 1990
- Impact of maternal postnatal depression on cognitive development of young children.BMJ, 1986
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Transactive discussions with peers and adults.Developmental Psychology, 1986
- Pregnancy problems, postpartum depression, and early mother-infant interactions.Developmental Psychology, 1985
- The impact of twinship on parent-child interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977