THE SUPPLY‐DRIVEN INPUT‐OUTPUT MODEL: A NEW INTERPRETATION BUT STILL IMPLAUSIBLE
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Regional Science
- Vol. 29 (3) , 459-465
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01391.x
Abstract
In this reply, I argue that the production function proposed by Gruver provides a theoretical foundation for the supply model only in a most trivial case. He proposes a more general alternative which is, however, still very implausible. Furthermore, against Rose and Allison, I argue that small input‐coefficient changes provide an insufficient excuse for using the supply model for impact studies, and I show that employment estimates may be quite different depending on the approach used.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- ON THE PLAUSIBILITY OF THE SUPPLY—DRIVEN INPUT‐OUTPUT MODEL: A THEORETICAL BASIS FOR INPUT‐COEFFICIENT CHANGE*Journal of Regional Science, 1989
- ON THE PLAUSIBILITY OF THE SUPPLY‐DRIVEN INPUT‐OUTPUT MODEL: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON JOINT STABILITY*Journal of Regional Science, 1989
- ON THE PLAUSIBILITY OF THE SUPPLY‐DRIVEN INPUT‐OUTPUT MODELJournal of Regional Science, 1988