The Use of Armspan in Nutritional Assessment of the Elderly
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 39 (5) , 492-496
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb02495.x
Abstract
The use of body mass index (BMI) in the elderly is limited by the measurement of height which is often unreliable. Armspan approximates to height at maturity. It may, therefore, be an alternative to height in calculating BMI. We studied the relationship between height and armspan in 101 elderly men and women. A comparison of BMI by height and armspan was made. The correlation between height and armspan was 0.93. Armspan could be estimated by doubling halfspan (recumbent). The mean difference between BMI by height and armspan was 1.79 (SD 1.11) kg/M2. We concluded that armspan is a reliable and practical estimate of height in the non-ambulant elderly. There is a case for the use of armspan instead of height in the determination of BMI in the elderly.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relation Between Height, Armspan and Forced Expiratory Volume in Elderly WomenAge and Ageing, 1989
- Body mass index and mortality in the elderly.BMJ, 1986
- Anthropometric norms in the elderlyBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1984
- UNDERNUTRITION, HYPOTHERMIA, AND INJURY IN ELDERLY WOMEN WITH FRACTURED FEMUR: AN INJURY RESPONSE TO ALTERED METABOLISM?The Lancet, 1983
- Anthropometrics revisitedProceedings of the Nutrition Society, 1982
- Arm Length Measurement as an Alternative to Height in Nutritional Assessment of the ElderlyJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1982
- Differences between arm span and stature in white childrenJournal of Adolescent Health Care, 1981
- A comparison of the skinfold method with extent of ‘overweight’ and various weight-height relationships in the assessment of obesityBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1977