Relative Efficiency of Some Mechanical Traps Used in the Study of the Tsetse Species, Glossina Pallidipes Austen
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Tropical Insect Science
- Vol. 1 (2) , 197-201
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742758400000394
Abstract
The biconical trap of Challier and Laveissier was compared with Langridge''s box screen (LBS) and Moloo''s awning screen skirt (ASS) for relative efficiency in catching the tsetse species, G. pallidipes Austen, in 2 areas in Kenya. The dark blue biconical trap performed better than the ASS in 1 area, but both of them caught more males than females. In the other area, the sky blue version of the biconical gave higher yields than LBS and the white biconical. In both areas, the white biconical trap caught the highest proportion of old flies, while ASS caught the highest proportion of young flies. The biconical trap is preferable because it is collapsible, easy to handle and transport and needs minimal manpower to operate, unlike the LBS and ASS.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to mobile and stationary baitsBulletin of Entomological Research, 1974
- A new trap for Glossina pallidipes Aust. and G. fuscipes Newst. (Dipt., Glossinidae)Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1973
- The effect of site and sampling method on the size and composition of catches of tsetse flies (Glossina) and Tabanidae (Diptera)Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1964
- Teaps in field studies of Glossina pallidipes AustenBulletin of Entomological Research, 1961
- THE BIOLOGY OF TSETSE FLIESBiological Reviews, 1949
- The Causes and Implications of Hunger in Tsetse-fliesBulletin of Entomological Research, 1933
- Investigations into the Bionomics of Glossina palpalisBulletin of Entomological Research, 1920