Anencephaly and spina bifida among Hispanics: Maternal, sociodemographic, and acculturation factors in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study
- 30 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
- Vol. 85 (7) , 637-646
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20582
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We used data from the multisite National Birth Defects Prevention Study for expected delivery dates from October 1997 through 2003, to determine whether the increased risk in anencephaly and spina bifida (neural tube defects (NTDs)) in Hispanics was explained by selected sociodemographic, acculturation, and other maternal characteristics. METHODS: For each type of defect, we examined the association with selected maternal characteristics stratified by race/ethnicity and the association with Hispanic parents' acculturation level, relative to non-Hispanic whites. We used logistic regression and calculated crude odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Hispanic mothers who reported the highest level of income were 80% less likely to deliver babies with spina bifida. In addition, highly educated Hispanic and white mothers had 76 and 35% lower risk, respectively. Other factors showing differing effects for spina bifida in Hispanics included maternal age, parity, and gestational diabetes. For spina bifida there was no significant elevated risk for U.S.–born Hispanics, relative to whites, but for anencephaly, corresponding ORs ranged from 1.9 to 2.3. The highest risk for spina bifida was observed for recent Hispanic immigrant parents from Mexico or Central America residing in the United States <5 years (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.46–7.37). CONCLUSIONS: Less acculturated Hispanic parents seemed to be at highest risk of NTDs. For anencephaly, U.S.–born and English-speaking Hispanic parents were also at increased risk. Finally, from an etiologic standpoint, spina bifida and anencephaly appeared to be etiologically heterogeneous from these analyses. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2009.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prevalence and predictors of anencephaly and spina bifida in TexasPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2008
- Neural Tube Defects and Maternal Folate Intake Among Pregnancies Conceived After Folic Acid Fortification in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Diabetes mellitus and birth defectsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- National estimates and race/ethnic‐specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999–2001Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2006
- Changes in the birth prevalence of selected birth defects after grain fortification wiht folic acid in the United States: Findings from a multi-state population-based studyBirth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2005
- Decline in the Prevalence of Spina Bifida and Anencephaly by Race/Ethnicity: 1995–2002Pediatrics, 2005
- Congenital malformations in offspring of Hispanic and African‐American women in California, 1989–1997Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2004
- Prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly during the transition to mandatory folic acid fortification in the United StatesTeratology, 2002
- Collecting and interpreting birth defects surveillance data by Hispanic ethnicity: A comparative studyTeratology, 2000
- Neural tube defects--why are rates high among populations of Mexican descent?Environmental Health Perspectives, 1995