A comparison of verapamil and nifedipine on quality of life.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. Aspects of quality of life (symptoms, psychological well‐being and activity) were evaluated by self‐administered questionnaires in a 4 month randomised double‐blind trial of titrated doses of verapamil slow release (n = 41) compared with nifedipine retard (n = 40). An untreated diastolic blood pressure of 95‐115 mm Hg was required for inclusion in the trial. 2. The mean age in both groups was 55 years. A significant difference between the two drugs was found in the average reporting of symptoms with an increase on nifedipine (P less than 0.01). The reporting of swollen ankles and flushing (P less than 0.05) increased on nifedipine, and nocturia (P less than 0.05) increased on verapamil. Measures of psychiatric morbidity tended to improve on verapamil and deteriorate on nifedipine. Only the change in cognitive function was significant between the drugs, being worse on nifedipine (P = 0.05). 3. There was no difference between the two groups in the fall in diastolic blood pressure (average 18 mm Hg on nifedipine and 17 mm Hg on verapamil). There was a significantly greater fall in systolic blood pressure on nifedipine (23 mm Hg) compared with verapamil (13 mm Hg) (P less than 0.01). 4. The two drugs differed in their effects on measures of quality of life. The improvements in symptomatic complaints and psychological well‐being on verapamil may have been due to inclusion in a trial, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a drug effect. Conversely the increase in symptoms and self‐assessed cognitive impairment on nifedipine were considered to be side‐effects of the drug.