Duty to Directly Communicate Radiologic Abnormalities: Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far?
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- case report
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 181 (2) , 375-381
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810375
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communicating Findings of Radiologic ExaminationsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- Evidence-Based Medicine and the Law: The Courts Confront Clinical Practice GuidelinesJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001
- Of Swords and Shields: The Role of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Medical Malpractice LitigationUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2001
- Malpractice issues in radiology. American College of Radiology Standard for Communication.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1999
- Standard of care.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Communication of the significant but not urgent finding.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Communication of the urgent finding.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Legal Implications of Practice Guidelines for Physicians and Professional SocietiesSeminars in Interventional Radiology, 1995
- Practice Guidelines and Malpractice Litigation: A Two-Way StreetAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- When is it malpractice to miss lung cancer on chest radiographs?Radiology, 1990