Cutaneous Anaphylaxis in the Guinea Pig and Its Relative Insusceptibility to an Antihistamine
Open Access
- 1 January 1963
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 90 (1) , 43-51
- https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.90.1.43
Abstract
The antihistamine, triprolidine, was tested for its capacity to suppress the increased capillary permeability in active, direct passive and reversed passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in guinea pigs. Whereas triprolidine caused a 500- to a 5000-fold suppression of the permeability response to intracutaneously injected histamine, it was never capable of suppressing the anaphylactic response more than 10-fold. In four out of eight experiments, the suppression of anaphylaxis was less than 2-fold, a difference shown to be within the range of experimental error. Our findings fail to support the notion that histamine is an important mediator in cutaneous anaphylaxis. On the contrary, they indicate that histamine plays little or no role in the events leading to the increase in capillary permeability in cutaneous anaphylaxis, regardless of its presumed role in other manifestations of immediate hypersensitivity. We have stressed the point that individual variation in the anaphylactic response must be taken into account in assessing the possible suppressive effect of an antagonist. To be considered significant, the degree of suppression must fall beyond the limits of this variability. In these experiments, the effects of inter-animal variation were minimized by comparing the means of responses in groups of animals. Furthermore, the degree of suppression of anaphylaxis was viewed in relation to the suppression of the response to histamine in the same animals. The relatively slight differences in the anaphylactic response between triprolidine-treated and control animals could have arisen from normal variation. The histamine response, however, was always suppressed to a degree far beyond the limits of natural variability. If histamine were an important mediator in the permeability response in cutaneous anaphylaxis, one might expect a potent antihistamine to suppress the anaphylactic response to a degree at least approaching the magnitude of the 500- to 5000-fold suppression of histamine.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Species differences in susceptibility to capillary permeability factors: histamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine and compound 48/80The Journal of Physiology, 1957
- ENZYME-LIKE GLOBULINS FROM SERUM REPRODUCING THE VASCULAR PHENOMENA OF INFLAMMATION .3. FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE PERMEABILITY FACTOR AND ITS INHIBITOR IN GUINEA-PIG SERUM1957
- The role of histamine in cutaneous antigen-antibody reactions in the ratThe Journal of Physiology, 1955
- The fractionation of mammalian serum proteins with etherBiochemical Journal, 1955
- ENZYME-LIKE GLOBULINS FROM SERUM REPRODUCING THE VASCULAR PHENOMENA OF INFLAMMATION .2. ISOLATION AND PROPERTIES OF THE PERMEABILITY FACTOR AND ITS INHIBITOR1955
- ENZYME-LIKE GLOBULINS FROM SERUM REPRODUCING THE VASCULAR PHENOMENA OF INFLAMMATION .1. AN ACTIVABLE PERMEABILITY FACTOR AND ITS INHIBITOR IN GUINEA-PIG SERUM1955
- Study of Arthus Reaction and of Cutaneous Anaphylaxis Induced Passively in the Rat.Experimental Biology and Medicine, 1952
- Vascular reactions to histamine, histamine‐liberator and leukotaxine in the skin of guinea‐pigsThe Journal of Physiology, 1952