The Impact of Iceberg Orders in Limit Order Books
- 17 May 2009
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We examine the impact of iceberg orders on the price and order flow dynamics in limit order books. Iceberg orders allow traders to simultaneously hide a large portion of their order size and signal their interest in trading to the market. We show that when market participants detect iceberg orders they tend to strongly respond by submitting matching market orders consistent with iceberg orders facilitating the search for latent liquidity. The greater the fraction of an iceberg order that is executed the smaller its price impact consistent with liquidity rather than informed trading. The presence of iceberg orders is associated with increased trading consistent with a positive liquidity externality, but the reduced order book transparency associated with iceberg orders also creates an adverse selection cost for limit orders that may partly offset any gains.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Undisclosed Orders and Optimal Submission Strategies in a Dynamic Limit Order MarketSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Hidden liquidity: An analysis of order exposure strategies in electronic stock marketsJournal of Financial Economics, 2009
- The information content of an open limit‐order bookJournal of Futures Markets, 2008
- Hide-and-Seek in the Market: Placing and Detecting Hidden Orders*European Finance Review, 2007
- The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidityJournal of Financial Economics, 2005
- Expandable limit order marketsJournal of Financial Markets, 2004
- The use of undisclosed limit orders on the Australian Stock ExchangeJournal of Banking & Finance, 2001
- The total cost of trading Belgian shares: Brussels versus LondonJournal of Banking & Finance, 1999
- Optimal control of execution costsJournal of Financial Markets, 1998
- An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris BourseThe Journal of Finance, 1995