EFFECTS OF A PAIRING CONTINGENCY ON BEHAVIOR IN A THREE‐PERSON PROGRAMMED ENVIRONMENT
- 1 March 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 29 (2) , 319-329
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1978.29-319
Abstract
Four groups of three subjects resided for 10 days within a continuously programmed environment. Subjects followed a behavioral program of contingently scheduled activities that determined individual and social behaviors. A triadic condition was in effect when all three subjects were required to select simultaneous access to a group area before it became available for a social episode. A dyadic condition was in effect when access to a group area was permitted to any combination of two, and only two, subjects. The effects of these two conditions on individual and social behaviors were studied in reversal designs with several successive days devoted to each condition. Results showed that durations of social activities and synchronization of individual activities were greater during triadic conditions than during dyadic conditions. Under both conditions, wake‐sleep cycles departed from a typical day‐night rhythm for most subjects. Instances when subjects did not respond to each others' attempts to initiate conversations using the intercom were generally more frequent during dyadic than triadic conditions. Physical distance during triadic social episodes was found to be related to sociability levels during dyadic conditions.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFECTS OF A COOPERATION CONTINGENCY ON BEHAVIOR IN A CONTINUOUS THREE‐PERSON ENVIRONMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976
- Effects of compatibility, crowding, group size, and leadership seniority on stress, anxiety, hostility, and annoyance in isolated groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972
- An Analysis of Mood StatesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1967
- Personal spaceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965