Choice of secondary prevention improves risk factors after acute coronary syndrome: 1-year follow-up of the CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) randomised controlled trial
- 18 September 2008
- Vol. 95 (6) , 468-475
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.150870
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of a new CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) programme on cardiovascular risk factors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors. Design: Single-blind randomised controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary referral hospital in Sydney Australia. Patients: 144 ACS survivors who were not accessing standard cardiac rehabilitation. Data were also collected on a further 64 ACS survivors attending standard cardiac rehabilitation. Intervention: The CHOICE group (n = 72) participated in a brief, patient-centred, modular programme comprising a clinic visit plus telephone support, encompassing mandatory cholesterol lowering and tailored preferential risk modification. The control group (n = 72) participated in continuing conventional care but no centrally coordinated secondary prevention. Main outcome measures: Values for total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, smoking status and physical activity. Results: CHOICE and control groups were well matched at baseline. At 12 months, the CHOICE group (n = 67) had significantly better risk factor levels than controls (n = 69) for total cholesterol (TC) (mean (SEM) 4.0 (0.1) vs 4.7 (0.1) mmol/l, p<0.001), systolic blood pressure (131.6 (1.8) vs 143.9 (2.3) mm Hg, p<0.001), body mass index (28.9 (0.7) vs 31.2 (0.7) kg/m(2), p = 0.025) and physical activity (1369.1 (167.2) vs 715.1 (103.5) METS/kg/min, p = 0.001) as well as a better knowledge of risk factor targets. Also at 1 year, fewer CHOICE participants (21%) had three or more risk factors above widely recommended levels then controls (72%) (p<0.001). Conclusions: Participation in a brief CHOICE programme significantly improved the modifiable risk profiles and risk factor knowledge of ACS survivors over 12 months. CHOICE is an effective alternative for dealing with the widespread underuse of existing secondary prevention programmes.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac rehabilitation in the United KingdomHeart, 2008
- The Birmingham rehabilitation uptake maximisation study (BRUM): a randomised controlled trial comparing home-based with centre-based cardiac rehabilitationHeart, 2008
- Assessing patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation as a basis for predicting attendance after acute myocardial infarctionHeart, 2007
- Development and testing of innovative patient resources for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD): a descriptive studyBMC Health Services Research, 2006
- Long term adherence to dietary recommendations after inpatient rehabilitation: prospective follow up study of patients with coronary heart diseaseHeart, 2006
- Current and Future Directions of Cardiovascular Risk PredictionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Explaining the Decline in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in England and Wales Between 1981 and 2000Circulation, 2004
- Secondary Prevention Through Cardiac Rehabilitation Position Paper of the Working Group on Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology of the European Society of CardiologyEuropean Heart Journal, 2003
- A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial InfarctionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994