The Cultural Embeddedness of Social Control:
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theoretical Criminology
- Vol. 5 (4) , 403-424
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480601005004001
Abstract
In this article I argue that, in order to understand the deep historical and present differences in the quality and quantity of punishment (as measured by imprisonment) between Italy and the United States, it is necessary to situate the specific punitive histories of these two societies within their cultural traditions. Such traditions are deeply marked by different concepts and experiences of religion, i.e. Catholicism and Protestantism. However, the relation between religious ethos and punitive practices is not one of causal determinism. Rather, cultural embeddedness fashions conceptual and rhetorical toolkits that allow for the shaping of specific punitive orientations, which respond also to other fundamental features of society, such as socio-economic conditions and political cultures and regimes.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corrupt ExchangesPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2017
- Counter-Colonial CriminologyPublished by JSTOR ,2015
- FORGIVENESS AND FUNDAMENTALISM: RECONSIDERING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORRECTIONAL ATTITUDES AND RELIGION*Criminology, 2000
- Democracy in AmericaPublished by University of Chicago Press ,2000
- Labor Surplus and Punishment: A Review and Assessment of Theory and EvidenceSocial Problems, 1992
- The Vanishing Female: The Decline of Women in the Criminal Process, 1687-1912Law & Society Review, 1991
- DECARCERATION IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANYThe British Journal of Criminology, 1990
- A Test of the Stability of Punishment Hypothesis: The Case of California, 1851-1970American Sociological Review, 1981
- Trends in Incarceration in the United States since 1880Crime & Delinquency, 1979
- The Dynamics of a Homeostatic Punishment ProcessThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1976