Risk and Benefit in Environmental Law
- 4 December 1981
- journal article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 214 (4525) , 1096-1100
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7302580
Abstract
Judicial review establishes whether the mandate of Congress is observed by an agency's rule-making mechanisms for setting environmental standards or other regulations. Central issues in risk assessment now include whether a risk is significant, what the burden of proof for significance is, how to resolve the tension between the effort to reduce hazardous exposures and the goal of efficient regulation, and precisely how and in what detail the costs of regulation must be measured. Under current regulatory statutes, there are several paradigms for balancing costs and benefits.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Judiciary: What Role in Health Improvement?Science, 1981
- High Technology and the Courts: Nuclear Power and the Need for Institutional ReformHarvard Law Review, 1981
- Environmental Decisionmaking and the Role of the CourtsUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1974
- Science and trans-scienceMinerva, 1972