Corruption, Extortion, and the Boundaries of the Law

  • 1 January 2006
    • preprint
    • Published in RePEc
Abstract
We consider a set-up in which a principal must decide whether or not to legalise a socially undesirable activity. The law is enforced by a monitor who may be bribed to conceal evidence of the offence and who may also engage in extortionary practices. The principal only declares the activity illegal if the activity if "very harmful" and if the private benefit (received by the agent if she breaks the law) is "high". We present comparative static results and highlight policy implications.
All Related Versions

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: