Comparative tests of conventional and retarding-potential Mott polarimeters
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Review of Scientific Instruments
- Vol. 72 (9) , 3728-3730
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1396658
Abstract
The performance of a spherical field-free and a conical retarding-potential Mott polarimeter is compared. The stability of the detector signal with respect to a change in the position of the incoming electron beam is studied for two different primary electron beam energies. Shifting the incoming electron beam by 0.6 mm does not change the counting rate in the spherical field-free detector but induces a 7% or 18% change in the conical retarding-potential detector when using 1600 and 500 eV electrons, respectively. This may result in an error of the measured electron spin polarization.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-Dimensional Magnetic ParticlesScience, 1998
- A new compact electron spin polarimeter with a high efficiencyReview of Scientific Instruments, 1997
- A new compact 60 kV Mott polarimeter for spin polarized electron spectroscopyReview of Scientific Instruments, 1997
- Magnetic interactions in different oxidation states of thin cobalt filmsJournal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1994
- Extrapolation procedures in Mott electron polarimetryReview of Scientific Instruments, 1992
- Simple and compact low-energy Mott polarization analyzerReview of Scientific Instruments, 1987
- Spin polarized Auger spectroscopy (invited)Journal of Applied Physics, 1985
- Simple, compact, medium-energy Mott polarization analyzerReview of Scientific Instruments, 1984
- Electron-spin polarization in low-energy electron diffraction from tungsten (001)Physical Review B, 1978
- Measurement of the Mott Asymmetry in Double Scattering of ElectronsPhysical Review B, 1959