Current Controversies in Prehospital Resuscitation of the Terminally Ill Patient
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
- Vol. 5 (1) , 49-57
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00026522
Abstract
Prehospital health-care providers regularly are called upon to assist terminally ill patients in residential or institutional, non-hospital settings such as nursing homes or hospices. Among the most crucial issues regarding such patients is whether they should be resuscitated. With alarming frequency, EMS providers are encountering vigorous and sometimes violent refusals of examination, treatment, and/or transportation from the terminally ill patient, members of the patient's family, or third persons ostensibly acting on the patient's behalf. Today, the prehospital emergency health-care provider repeatedly is faced with the legal and ethical questions that surround the issue of resuscitation and advanced life support.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders in the prehospital settingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1988
- The Decision to Forgo CPR in the Elderly PatientPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationJAMA, 1988
- The decision to forgo CPR in the elderly patientJAMA, 1988
- Ethics and Communication in Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Must We Always Use CPR?New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Do-Not-Resuscitate Order in a Teaching HospitalAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1982
- Orders Not to ResuscitateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976