Efficacy and Safety of Abacavir Plus Lamivudine Versus Didanosine Plus Stavudine When Combined with a Protease Inhibitor, a Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor, or Both in HIV-1 Positive Antiretroviral-Naive Persons
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in HIV Research & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 5 (6) , 361-370
- https://doi.org/10.1310/weqg-qthl-dl3x-ftxc
Abstract
Purpose: The combination of abacavir + lamivudine (ABC+3TC) versus didanosine + stavudine (ddI+d4T), each combined with other classes of antiretrovirals (ARVs) in ARV-naive patients, was compared for the combined endpoint of time to plasma HIV RNA >50 copies/mL (at or after the 8-month visit) or death (primary endpoint) in a nested substudy of an ongoing multicenter randomized trial. Method: The substudy enrolled 182 patients; mean HIV RNA and CD4+ cell counts at baseline were 5.1 log10 copies/mL and 212 cells/mm3, respectively. Results: After a median follow-up of 28 months, rates of primary endpoint were 57.2 and 67.8 per 100 person-years for the ABC+3TC and ddI+d4T groups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.14, p = .23). Conclusion: There was a trend for treatments containing ABC+3TC to be better than treatments containing ddI+d4T with respect to HIV RNA decreases, CD4+ cell count increases, and tolerability. PDF Keywords antiretroviral agents, controlled clinical trials, highly active antiretroviral therapy, reverse transcriptase inhibitors Related articles View all related articles var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/WEQG-QTHL-DL3X-FTXC Download Citation Recommend to: A friendKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abacavir versus Zidovudine Combined with Lamivudine and Efavirenz, for the Treatment of Antiretroviral‐Naive HIV‐Infected AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Comparison of Four-Drug Regimens and Pairs of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Comparison of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The prevalence and determinants of the K65R mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in tenofovir-naive patientsAIDS, 2002
- Abacavir Hypersensitivity ReactionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Comparison of dual nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimens with and without nelfinavir in children with HIV-1 who have not previously been treated: the PENTA 5 randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- A comparison of stavudine plus lamivudine versus zidovudine plus lamivudine in combination with indinavir in antiretroviral naive individuals with HIV infection: selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START I)AIDS, 2000
- A comparison of stavudine, didanosine and indinavir with zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infected individuals: Selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START II)*AIDS, 2000
- Lamivudine in combination with zidovudine, stavudine, or didanosine in patients with HIV-1 infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialAIDS, 1999
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958