Skeletal variation related to arm regeneration in Metacrinus and Saracrinus , Recent stalked crinoids
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS in Lethaia
- Vol. 19 (4) , 355-360
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1986.tb00752.x
Abstract
Variations in the number of skeletal elements in the proximal portion of the arms (primibrachials) of Metacrinus rotundus Carpenter and Saracrinus nobilis (Carpenter) are compared. Older specimens of Metacrinus rotundus show increased variation in number of elements along with a tendency toward reduction, whereas the number of elements remains nearly constant in Saracrinus nobilis. The variation in Metacrinus rotundus is attributed to inaccurate arm regeneration following autotomy. Separation of Saracrinus from Metacrinus on the basis of number of skeletal elements is therefore possible, but caution must be used in the application of taxonomic characters which might be influenced by regeneration.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolutionary implications of predation on Recent comatulid crinoids from the Great Barrier ReefPaleobiology, 1985
- Rate of arm regeneration and potential causes of arm loss in the feather star Florometra serratissima (Echinodermata: Crinoidea)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1983
- Fine structure of syzygial articulations before and after arm autotomy in florometra serratissima (Echinodermata: Crinoidea)Zoomorphology, 1981
- A photographic survey of a population of the stalked crinoid Diplocrinus (Annacrinus) wyvillethomsoni (Echinodermata) from the bathyal slope of the Bay of BiscayDeep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 1981
- Un exemple de relation etroite entre la geodynamique des oceans et l'evolution des faunes benthiques bathyales et abyssales; l'histoire des Crinoides pedoncules du Mesozoique a l'ActuelBSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin, 1979
- Adaptive radiation of the comatulid crinoidsPaleobiology, 1977
- A revision of the recent representatives of the crinoid family Pentacrinidae, with the diagnoses of two new generaJournal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1923