ARE INTRAVENOUS CANNULAE STILL BEING MISUSED?
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal Of Clinical Practice
- Vol. 50 (8) , 466-467
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.1996.tb09608.x
Abstract
SUMMARY We have surveyed the use of intravenous cannulae (IVC) in a district general hospital. Of 354 patients interviewed on various wards, 125 (35.3%) had IVC in situ. The wrist was the commonest location for the cannulae (41.6%). An indication for cannula insertion was present in the majority (93.7%) of patients. Cannulae were left in situ even after their use had ceased, most commonly on wards for the elderly, and on these wards complications were more common. Other wards had specific IVC documentation, which resulted in fewer complications. Cannulae should be used for specific indications and should be reviewed daily for the development of complications and the need for their continued presence.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fatal Sepsis following Peripheral Intravenous Cannula EmbolusChest, 1992
- WHY FLUSH PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CANNULAE USED FOR INTERMITTENT INTRAVENOUS INJECTION?International Journal Of Clinical Practice, 1991
- The Misuse of Intravenous CannulaeScottish Medical Journal, 1988
- A study of the use of intravenous cannulas for medical emergencies in Newham--implications for financial savingsPostgraduate Medical Journal, 1987
- Intravenous CatheterizationThe American Journal of Nursing, 1945