Comparing Physicians' Responses to the First and Second Mailings of a Questionnaire
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation & the Health Professions
- Vol. 12 (3) , 329-339
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016327878901200307
Abstract
Surveys are an important data collection method in evaluation research. Low response rates often occur, with follow-ups used to increase responses. However, surveys of homogeneous groups, such as physicians, about topics of concern to them may not require high response rates. We examined physician responses to a first and second mailing of a family practice questionnaire sent to a national sample of 308 recent residency graduates, 383 residency directors, and 319 residents. Among graduates, the first mailing produced a 63% response and the second another 17%; among directors, thefirstproduced 79% and the second another 10%; and among residents, the first gave 55% and the second another 21%. No differences between the two mailings existed by demographic variables, substantive questions ornonresponse to questions, with two exceptions. The absence of differences in physicians who responded to the follow-up questionnaire suggests that remailings to obtain higher response rates may be unnecessary in some surveys.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interviewing physicians: the effect of improved response rate.American Journal of Public Health, 1985
- Professionals as responders: variations in and effects of response rates to questionnaires, 1961-77.BMJ, 1978
- Interim Response to a Mail Questionnaire: Impacts on Variable RelationshipsThe Sociological Quarterly, 1978
- RESPONSE RATES AND QUALITY OF DATA: A RE‐EXAMINATION OF THE MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE*Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 1977
- A comparison of physicians who did or did not respond to a postal questionnaire.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Nonresponse Effects on Relationships Between VariablesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1976
- XXXIV. The other side of ‘statistical significance’: alpha, beta. delta, and the calculation of sample sizeClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1975
- Are high response rates essential to valid surveys?Social Science Research, 1972
- Bias Due to Nonresponse in a Mail Survey of Rhode Island Physicians' Smoking Habits -1968New England Journal of Medicine, 1970
- Physicians' Reactions to a Mailed Questionnaire: A Study in "Resistentialism"Public Opinion Quarterly, 1956