Dose-Response Study of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Intrathecal Neostigmine, Their Combination, or Placebo for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Anterior and Posterior Vaginoplasty
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 82 (6) , 1182-1187
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199606000-00014
Abstract
This study was designed to examine postoperative analgesia with intrathecal neostigmine in a randomized, blinded trial with morphine as the active control in patients undergoing anterior and posterior vaginoplasty. A secondary aim was to provide preliminary data on the interaction between these two drugs. The incidence of adverse effects was also assessed. Forty-eight patients were divided into eight groups (50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms morphine [M]; saline; 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms neostigmine [N]; and 50 micrograms morphine + 50 micrograms neostigmine). Anesthesia was provided with a balanced technique. All patients stayed 24 h in the recovery room where adequacy of postoperative analgesia and side effects were assessed. Increasing doses of intrathecal morphine (50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms) and intrathecal neostigmine (50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms) showed a dose-dependent pattern of analgesia (P < 0.001). The M50 + N50 combination resulted in a better analgesic effect with fewer side effects than M50, N50, and control groups. These preliminary data suggest that spinal neostigmine produces analgesia for vaginoplasty surgery similar in duration to spinal morphine and that the combination of morphine and neostigmine may allow a reduction in the dose of each component for postoperative analgesia.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies on the Safety of Chronically Administered Intrathecal Neostigmine Methylsulfate in Rats and DogsAnesthesiology, 1995
- Phase I Safety Assessment of Intrathecal Neostigmine Methylsulfate in HumansAnesthesiology, 1995
- A double‐blind trial of the analgesic properties of physostigmine in postoperative patientsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1986
- Antinociceptive effects of intrathecally injected cholinomimetic drugs in the rat and catEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1985
- The relevance of cholinergic transmission at the spinal level to opiate effectivenessEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1983
- EFFECT OF PHYSOSTIGMINE ON MORPHINE-INDUCED POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND SOMNOLENCEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1982
- Autoradiographic localization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in rat brainstemJournal of Neuroscience, 1981
- The effect of biogenic amine modifiers on morphine analgesia and its antagonism by naloxoneEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1976
- Comparison of the antinociceptive activities of physostigmine, oxotremorine and morphine in the mouseBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1971
- The Analgetic Action of Morphine, Eserine and Prostigmine Studied by a Modified Hardy‐Wolff‐Goodell Method.Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 1945