Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Vision Research
- Vol. 30 (3) , 449-461
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90086-z
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why are some spatial discriminations independent of contrast?Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1989
- Receptive field properties of human motion detector units inferred from spatial frequency maskingVision Research, 1989
- Position and spatial frequency in large-scale localization judgmentsVision Research, 1986
- Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validationJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1985
- Is reduced vernier acuity in amblyopia due to position, contrast or fixation deficits?Vision Research, 1985
- The effects of large orientation and spatial frequency differences on spatial discriminationsVision Research, 1984
- Independence of orientation and size in spatial discriminationsJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1983
- The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dotsVision Research, 1982
- Limits of spatial-frequency discrimination as evidence of neural interpolationJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1982
- Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1982