Whole‐genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray
- 30 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 29 (12) , 1156-1166
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2371
Abstract
Objective To determine the detection rates of whole‐genome microarray technology compared to targeted microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in prenatal samples submitted for diagnostic testing. Methods Microarray analysis using either whole‐genome bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)‐based and oligonucleotide (oligo)‐based microarrays or targeted BAC microarrays was performed on 182 and 62 prenatal cases, respectively, from North American healthcare providers without previously known chromosome abnormalities or family history of a parent with a known chromosome rearrangement. Results Microarray analysis identified clinically significant chromosome alterations in 7 out of 182 (3.8%) prenatal specimens, two of which each had two unrelated abnormalities. After excluding two of the cases in which the abnormality would have been identified by routine karyotyping, the diagnostic yield of clinically significant findings was 5 out of 182 (2.7%). One case had a finding of unclear significance (0.5%) and 16 cases had benign copy number variants (CNVs) (8.8%). Targeted microarray analysis combined with previously published data demonstrated detection rates of 0.9% for clinically significant results, 0.5% for results of unclear significance, and 8.0% for benign CNVs. Conclusions Whole‐genome prenatal aCGH detected clinically significant submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities in addition to chromosome abnormalities that could be identified by concurrent karyotyping without an increase in unclear results or benign CNVs compared to targeted aCGH. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 casesPrenatal Diagnosis, 2008
- High‐resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosisPrenatal Diagnosis, 2008
- Expanding the clinical phenotype of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome and characterization of the reciprocal microduplicationMolecular Cytogenetics, 2008
- From microscopes to microarrays: dissecting recurrent chromosomal rearrangementsNature Reviews Genetics, 2007
- The identification of microdeletion syndromes and other chromosome abnormalities: Cytogenetic methods of the past, new technologies for the futureAmerican Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-Seminars In Medical Genetics, 2007
- Microarray genetic screening: a prenatal roadblock for life?The Lancet, 2007
- Use of targeted array‐based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: Is less more?American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2005
- Detection of large-scale variation in the human genomeNature Genetics, 2004
- Interstitial deletion in Xp22.3 is associated with X linked ichthyosis, mental retardation, and epilepsyJournal of Medical Genetics, 2000
- The isolated choroid plexus cystPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998