Comparison of efficacy and immunogenicity of original versus current botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia
Top Cited Papers
- 8 April 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 60 (7) , 1186-1188
- https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000055087.96356.bb
Abstract
The authors compared 130 patients treated for cervical dystonia with original botulinum toxin (BTX) type A (Botox; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA), 42 of whom were exposed only to the original BTX type A used before 1998 (25 ng protein/100 units), and 119 treated only with the current BTX type A (5 ng of protein/100 units). Blocking antibodies were detected in 4 of 42 (9.5%) patients treated only with original BTX type A but in none of the 119 patients treated exclusively with current BTX type A (p < 0.004). The current preparation decreased the risk of antibody formation by a factor of six. The authors conclude that the low risk of antibody formation after current BTX type A treatment is related to lower protein load.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Secondary nonresponsiveness to new bulk botulinum toxin A (BCB2024)Movement Disorders, 2002
- A comparison of the safety margins of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, B, and F in miceToxicon, 2001
- Focal dystonia: The role of botulinum toxinCurrent Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2001
- Comparison of mouse bioassay and immunoprecipitation assay for botulinum toxin antibodiesJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1999
- Mouse bioassay versus Western blot assay for botulinurn toxin antibodies Correlation with clinical responseNeurology, 1998
- Response and immunoresistance to botulinum toxin injectionsNeurology, 1995