Semi-allogeneic (F1) versus fully allogeneic blood transfusions: differences in their ability to induce specific immunological unresponsiveness
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 26 (7) , 1468-1474
- https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830260710
Abstract
The beneficial effect on graft survival achieved by pretransplant blood transfusions is well established. However, the type of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) mismatch between transfusion donor and recipient seems to play a role in determining the outcome. The hypothesis that this sharing of MHC antigens is correlated with the level of sensitization or tolerization was studied in mice by pretreatment with semi‐allogeneic (F1) or with fully allogeneic whole blood transfusions. Limiting dilution analysis (LDA) in vitro for donor‐specific T helper (Thp) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors (CTLp) performed on splenocytes isolated from transfused recipients 2 or 4 weeks after transfusion showed that the duration and magnitude of the response was reduced after a semi‐allogeneic compared to a fully allogeneic transfusion. After a semi‐allogeneic transfusion, both Thp and CTLp frequencies had returned to naive levels 4 weeks after transfusion, whereas after infusion of fully allogeneic blood, they remained elevated after 4 weeks. When a fully allogeneic heart was transplanted 2 or 4 weeks after transfusion, a small but significant improvement in graft prolongation (2 weeks, not significant, 4 weeks: p < 0.01) was observed following pretreatment with a semi‐allogeneic transfusion (2 weeks: median survival time (MST) 30 days, 4 weeks: MST 29 days) compared to that obtained after fully allogeneic transfusion (2 weeks: MST 23 days, 4 weeks: MST 12 days). The semi‐allogeneic transfusions were correlated with a statistically significant prolonged (7 days) persistence of donor‐derived MHC class II+ cells in the recipient and with reduced levels of anti‐donor MHC class I‐specific antibody formation compared to these responses after transfusion with fully allogeneic cells. These results demonstrate that pretreatment with a semi‐allogeneic blood transfusion is more tolerizing and less sensitizing than pretreatment with a fully allogeneic blood transfusion. These findings may be explained by the sharing of MHC antigens between recipient and transfusion donor.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- MICROCHIMERISM LINKED TO CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTIONAL UNRESPONSIVENESS (CLONAL ANERGY) IN A TOLERANT RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTTransplantation, 1995
- Correlation between lymphocyte-induced donor-specific tolerance and donor cell recirculation.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1992
- Induction of peripheral tolerance to class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) alloantigens in adult mice: transfused class I MHC-incompatible splenocytes veto clonal responses of antigen-reactive Lyt-2+ T cells.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1990
- Induction of transplantation tolerance by intravenous injection of allogeneic lymphocytes across an H‐2 class II mismatch. Different mechanisms operate in tolerization across an H‐2 class I vs. H‐2 class II disparityEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1990
- ALLOGRAFT TOLERANCE INDUCTION IN ADULT MICE ASSOCIATED WITH FUNCTIONAL DELETION OF SPECIFIC CTL PRECURSORSTransplantation, 1989
- Mixed chimerism and permanent specific transplantation tolerance induced by a nonlethal preparative regimen.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1989
- IMMUNE REACTIVITY IN CONGENIC MICE AFTER ALLOGENEIC OR ISOGENEIC TRANSFUSIONTransplantation, 1986
- An immunological suppressor cell inactivating cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor cells recognizing itNature, 1980
- THE MECHANISM OF SPECIFIC IMMUNOSUPPRESSION OF RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION BY DONOR STRAIN BLOODTransplantation, 1972
- CADAVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTSTransplantation, 1967