Grading inaccuracies in diagnostic biopsies revealing prostatic adenocarcinoma: Implications for definitive radiation therapy
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Vol. 32 (2) , 479-482
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00619-v
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer statistics, 1994CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1994
- Outcome for lymph node dissection negative T-1b, T-2 (A-2,B) prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy in RTOG 77-06International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- The significance of low-grade prostate cancer on needle biopsy. A radical prostatectomy study of tumor grade, volume, and stage of the biopsied and multifocal tumorCancer, 1990
- Gleason histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma. Correlations between biopsy and prostatectomy specimensCancer, 1986
- Reliability of gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimensUrology, 1985
- The Accuracy of Diagnostic Biopsy Specimens in Predicting Tumor Grades by Gleason’s Classification of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 1984
- Understaging and undergrading of prostate cancer Argument for postoperative radiation as adjuvant therapyUrology, 1983
- Prognostic significance of nucleolar surface area in prostate cancerUrology, 1982
- Grading Errors in Prostatic Needle Biopsies: Relation to the Accuracy of Tumor Grade in Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1982
- The value of perineal punch biopsy in estimating the histological grade of carcinoma of the prostateThe Prostate, 1980