Abdominal Wound Closure With a Continuous Monofilament Polypropylene Suture
- 1 November 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 118 (11) , 1305-1308
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390110053012
Abstract
• We report our experience with 1,000 consecutive abdominal wound closures using continuous monofilament polypropylene (Prolene) sutures. Wound dehiscence occurred in four patients (0.4%), and incisional hernia occurred in seven patients (0.7%). The incidence of persistent suture sinus was less than 1%. A comparison of these results with the reported data showed that this method was at least equal to other types of wound closure. While the polypropylene suture is more difficult to handle than traditional sutures, it is probably the preferred suture for contaminated and dirty wounds. It has eliminated the need for retention sutures in our practice, and its use as a continuous, running closure has offered the advantage over the usual interrupted technique of being simpler, faster, and more cost effective. Sepsis has continued to be the greatest cause of failure of abdominal wounds to heal. (Arch Surg1983;118:1305-1308)This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowel operationsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1981
- Mechanical Properties of Suture MaterialsAnnals of Surgery, 1981
- Closure of the Abdominal WoundJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1979
- Does the peritoneum need to be closed at laparotomy?British Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Abdominal wound closure: A trial of nylon, polyglycolic acid and steel suturesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1977
- The burst abdominal wound: A mechanical approachBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materialsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Visceral and parietal suture in abdominal surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Causes and management of surgical wound dehiscenceCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 1972
- The suturing of abdominal incisions. A comparison of monofilament nylon and catgutBritish Journal of Surgery, 1967