Genetic structure, metapopulation processes and evolution influence the conservation strategies for two endangered frog species
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Biological Conservation
- Vol. 83 (1) , 43-54
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(97)00045-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mobility and metapopulation structure of Geocrinia alba and Geocrinia vitellina, two endangered frog species from southwestern AustraliaAustralian Journal of Ecology, 1997
- Mitochondrial DNA variation among populations of Oedura reticulata (Gekkonidae) in remnant vegetation: implications for metapopulation structure and population declineMolecular Ecology, 1995
- Conservation Genetics of Bull Trout in the Columbia and Klamath River DrainagesConservation Biology, 1993
- Biogeographic Barriers in a Subdued Landscape: The Distribution of the Geocrinia rosea (Anura: Myobatrachidae) Complex in South-Western AustraliaJournal of Biogeography, 1993
- Genetic structure, outcrossing rate and heterosis in Astrocaryum mexicanum (tropical palm): implications for evolution and conservationHeredity, 1992
- Temporal Fluctuations in Demographic Parameters and the Genetic Variance among PopulationsEvolution, 1992
- Genetic Population Structure and Levels of Gene Flow in the Stream Dwelling Waterstrider, Aquarius (=Gerris) remigis (Hemiptera: Gerridae)Evolution, 1992
- Spatial Relationship and Gene Flow Paths between Populations of the Alpine Snail Arianta arbustorum (Pulmonata: Helicidae)Evolution, 1990
- THE CONTRIBUTION OF POPULATION AND COMMUNITY BIOLOGY TO CONSERVATION SCIENCEAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1988
- Loss of Genetic Diversity from Managed Populations: Interacting Effects of Drift, Mutation, Immigration, Selection, and Population SubdivisionConservation Biology, 1987