Why Was British Growth So Slow During the Industrial Revolution?
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 44 (3) , 687-712
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700032320
Abstract
Although it has been labeled the “First Industrial Revolution,” British growth and industrialization was slow between the 1760s and the 1820s. The explanation seems to lie with low capital formation shares in national income, low rates of accumulation, and thus little change in the capital-labor ratio. What accounts for the modest investment rates? Lack of thrift? Weak investment demand? This paper argues that the answer is to be found in the enormous debt issues used, to finance the French Wars.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- British Industrialization Before 1841: Evidence of Slower Growth During the Industrial RevolutionThe Journal of Economic History, 1982
- Inflation-Induced Distortions in Government and Private Saving StatisticsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979
- Inequality, Accumulation, and Technological Imbalance: A Growth-Equity Conflict in American History?Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1979
- Crowding Out or Crowding In? Economic Consequences of Financing Government DeficitsBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1978
- The Ricardian Nonequivalence TheoremJournal of Political Economy, 1977
- Barro on the Ricardian Equivalence TheoremJournal of Political Economy, 1976
- Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?Journal of Political Economy, 1974
- Private Savings: Ultrarationality, Aggregation, and 'Denison's Law'Journal of Political Economy, 1974
- Long-Run Implications of Alternative Fiscal Policies and the Burden of the National DebtThe Economic Journal, 1961
- Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of LabourThe Manchester School, 1954