Amplification or obfuscation: Is localization improving our clinical understanding of phosphorus metabolism?
- 15 December 1989
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in NMR in Biomedicine
- Vol. 2 (5-6) , 340-345
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1940020525
Abstract
Localization techniques are considered an indispensable part of the clinical spectroscopy examination. The results are often a marked improvement in diagnostic information (amplification), but because of the introduction of new artifacts and the more prolonged examination time, some of the undoubted advantage is lost (obfuscation). There is thus an argument for continued development of more rapid methods of clinical spectroscopy and, if necessary, sacrificing some spatial information.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN RENAL CORTEX AND MEDULLA IN THE RESPONSE TO HYPOTENSION USING LOCALIZED 31P MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPYTransplantation, 1989
- PEEP—A rapid chemical-shift imaging methodMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1989
- Metabolic Response of Glioblastoma to Adoptive ImmunotherapyJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1989
- In vivo implementation of three-dimensional phase-encoded spectroscopy with a correction for field inhomogeneityJournal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 1988
- Osteosarcoma and Other Neoplasms of BoneArchives of Surgery, 1987
- Clinical Magnetic Susceptibility Mapping of the BrainJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1987
- Depth-resolved surface-coil spectroscopy (DRESS) for in Vivo1H, 31P, and 13C NMRJournal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 1984
- 31P-NMR STUDIES OF A HUMAN TUMOUR IN SITUThe Lancet, 1983
- NON-INVASIVE INVESTIGATION OF CEREBRAL METABOLISM IN NEWBORN INFANTS BY PHOSPHORUS NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPYThe Lancet, 1983
- On the Origin of Cancer CellsScience, 1956