Do Democracies Fight each other? Evidence from the Peloponnesian War
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Peace Research
- Vol. 29 (4) , 415-434
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343392029004005
Abstract
The proposition that democracies rarely fight each other in the modern international system is increasingly accepted, and of great importance to theory and practice. Yet the reasons behind this phenomenon, and hence expectations as to how it may operate under other conditions, are still not well understood. This article systematically compiles information on wars and types of political systems in the world of ancient Greek city-states, and asks when and why democracies fought each other. A quantitative analysis of war-fighting patterns is inconclusive, but contextual examination of acts and perceptions as reported in ancient sources illuminates the motivations. Despite prominent exceptions, a norm against fighting other democracies was emerging and had some effect.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resource Unpredictability, Mistrust, and WarJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1992
- Dangerous DyadsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1992
- Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and WarAmerican Political Science Review, 1992
- Enlightened Self-Interest in the Peloponnesian War: Thucydidean Speakers on the Right of the Stronger and Inter-State PeaceCanadian Journal Of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 1991
- Thucydides and NeorealismInternational Studies Quarterly, 1989
- The Dialectical Logic of Thucydides' Melian DialogueAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Reason and WarAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- Liberalism and World PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- The Revolt at MytileneAmerican Journal of Philology, 1971
- Megara and MytilenePhoenix, 1968