Organizations, democracy, and the public sphere: The implications of democratic (r)evolution at a nuclear weapons facility
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Studies
- Vol. 48 (4) , 333-358
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368511
Abstract
This article examines the potential of democratic processes to transform even the most bureaucratically mired organization into an organization that has a more constructive relationship with its stakeholders and better represents and furthers the democratic ideals to which U.S. society aspires. After discussing Habermas's concept of the public sphere, the principle theoretical development focuses on the idea of organizations as the new public sphere; the issues addressed are whether or not they should be the public sphere and thus the role of organizations in a democratic society. These concepts are illustrated through a case study of the communication practices at the U.S. Department of Energy nuclear weapons facility at Fernald, Ohio. Finally, using the feminist critique of the public sphere to refine that concept, the article concludes that before organizations can become the new public sphere and function in the spirit of that concept, they must become more broadly democratic.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- On publics and public spheres: A response to PhillipsCommunication Monographs, 1997
- Opening up “the spaces of public dissension”Communication Monographs, 1997
- Corporate Transformations: Designer Culture, Designer Employees and `Post-Occupational' SolidarityOrganization, 1996
- Civil Society and Civil OrganizationsOrganization, 1996
- Democracy in the workplace: Theory and practice from the perspective of communicationJournal of Applied Communication Research, 1995
- Empowerment in organizations: Employees’ perceptions of the influences on empowermentJournal of Applied Communication Research, 1995
- Postmodern TheoryPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1991
- On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identificationCommunication Monographs, 1983
- Aristotle's concept of ethos, or if not his somebody else'sRhetoric Review, 1982
- On the End of Rhetoric, Classical and ModernCollege English, 1975