Ethical Analysis of the Concept of Disability
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) in Mental Retardation
- Vol. 42 (3) , 209-222
- https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<209:eaotco>2.0.co;2
Abstract
The concept of disability from an ethical viewpoint was examined. Whether disability results from the way society is built and the way ideas and judgments considering disability are established in a communal interaction was discussed (i.e., is disability socially created and constructed?). Although views on disability emphasizing its social nature are basically sound, they are also insufficient because they fail to consider the normative dimension attached to the concept of disability. The core of the concept of disability is ethical, which is why a moral philosophical examination of the concept is needed. Three possible ethical theories of disability (universal, objective, subjectivist, and communitarian) are briefly presented and discussed and a preliminary outline of a basis for a sound ethical model of disability presented.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The social model of disability: An outdated ideology?Published by Emerald Publishing ,2004
- First-hand Accounts of Emotional Experiences in Autism: A qualitative analysisDisability & Society, 2001
- What Kinds of People Should We Create?Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2000
- Constructions and Creations: Idealism, materialism and disability theoryDisability & Society, 1998
- Genetic Dilemmas and the Child's Right to an Open FutureHastings Center Report, 1997
- Cognitive Disability, Misfortune, and JusticePhilosophy & Public Affairs, 1996
- Reconciling Equality to Difference: Caring (F)or Justice For People With DisabilitiesHypatia, 1995
- Human Functioning and Social JusticePolitical Theory, 1992
- DISABILITY, HANDICAP, AND THE ENVIRONMENTJournal of Social Philosophy, 1992
- Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?Disability, Handicap & Society, 1992