Methods for Assessing the Credibility of Clinical Trial Outcomes
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Drug Information Journal
- Vol. 35 (4) , 1469-1478
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150103500442
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why should clinicians care about Bayesian methods?Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2001
- Clinical effects of early angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment for acute myocardial infarction are similar in the presence and absence of aspirinJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Mortality and Prehospital Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2000
- Methods in health service research: An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessmentBMJ, 1999
- Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studiesBMJ, 1998
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- For Debate: The statistical basis of public policy: a paradigm shift is overdueBMJ, 1996
- Domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners.BMJ, 1992
- Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.BMJ, 1992
- Treatment of Migraine Attacks with SumatriptanNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991