The Immigrant Assimilation Puzzle in Late Nineteenth-Centuty America
- 3 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 57 (1) , 34-62
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700017915
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that the earnings of pre-1890 immigrants grew slowly compared with those of natives and imply that these immigrants did not assimilate well into the American labor market. Using data for Michigan and California this article estimates new specifications for immigrant and native-born earnings, and finds that immigrants who arrived as children had similar earnings profiles to the native-born. Immigrants who arrived as adults suffered an initial earnings disadvantage but their earnings grew faster than those of the native-born. These results are consistent with the traditional view that pre-1890 immigrants assimilated well.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Economics of ImmigrationPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2018
- Assimilation and Changes in Cohort Quality Revisited: What Happened to Immigrant Earnings in the 1980s?Journal of Labor Economics, 1995
- Immigrant earnings, relative to what? The importance of earnings function specification and comparison pointsJournal of Applied Econometrics, 1994
- Empirical Age-Earnings ProfilesJournal of Labor Economics, 1990
- Assimilation, Changes in Cohort Quality, and the Earnings of ImmigrantsJournal of Labor Economics, 1985
- Experience and the Male—Female Earnings Gap in the 1890sThe Journal of Economic History, 1984
- City Size and Ethnic Discrimination: Michigan Agricultural Implements and Iron Working Industries, 1890The Journal of Economic History, 1982
- Ethnic discrimination in a 19th-century mining district: Michigan copper mines, 1888Explorations in Economic History, 1982
- The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-born MenJournal of Political Economy, 1978
- Race, Skills, and Earnings: American Immigrants in 1909The Journal of Economic History, 1971