The positional tendencies of sentential noun phrases in universal grammar
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique
- Vol. 25 (2) , 123-196
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100009373
Abstract
This paper is concerned with sentential subjects and sentential objects, subordinate clauses which function as subject or object of their sentence. The clausethat John is tallis a sentential subject in (1) and a sentential object in (2): (1)That John is tallis obvious. (2)Bill knowsthat John is tall. This paper is concerned in particular with the clause positions in which such sentential subjects and objects, henceforth sentential noun phrases (or NP’s), tend to occur in different languages. In (1), the sentential subject is in clause-initial position. In (2), the sentential object is in clause-final position. More precisely, this paper is concerned with the differences between the position of sentential NP’s and the position of simple NP’s (i.e. nonsentential NP’s). For example, the position of the sentential subject in (1) is also the normal position for simple NP subjects. If we replace the sentential subject in (1) by the simple NPthe conclusion, we get (3):(3) The conclusion is obvious.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Relational Grammar of KinyarwandaLanguage, 1981
- A Grammar of TuscaroraLanguage, 1978
- Woleaian Reference GrammarLanguage, 1978
- Reflections on LanguageLeonardo, 1978
- A Transformational Grammar of Spoken Egyptian ArabicLanguage, 1977
- Yaqui SyntaxLanguage, 1977
- Constraints on the Distribution of NP ClausesLanguage, 1977
- Our Latin Legacy, Book 1Classical World, 1969
- Universals of LanguageThe Modern Language Review, 1964
- Human memory and the storage of informationIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1956