Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 77 (2) , 379-384
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.2.379
Abstract
Background: Waist circumference (WC) is now accepted as a practical measure of adipose tissue distribution. Four body sites for WC measurements are commonly used, as follows: immediately below the lowest ribs (WC1), the narrowest waist (WC2), the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest (WC3), and immediately above the iliac crest (WC4). Objective: We sought to compare the magnitude and reliability of WC measured at these 4 sites in males and females. Design: WC was measured at each site 1 time in all subjects [49 males and 62 females, aged 7–83 y, with a body mass index (in kg/m2) of 9–43] and 3 times in a subgroup (n = 93) by one experienced observer using a heavy-duty inelastic tape. Body fat was measured in a subgroup (n = 74) with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: The mean values of WC were WC2 < WC1 < WC3 < WC4 (P < 0.01) in females and WC2 < WC1, WC3, and WC4 (P < 0.01) in males. For all 4 sites, measurement reproducibility was high, with intraclass correlation (r) values > 0.99. WC values were significantly correlated with fatness; correlations with trunk fat were higher than correlations with total body fat in both sexes. Conclusions: WC values at the 4 commonly used anatomic sites differ in magnitude depending on sex, are highly reproducible, and are correlated with total body and trunk adiposity in a sex-dependent manner. These observations have implications for the use of WC measurements in clinical practice and patient-oriented research.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anthropometric, computed tomography and fat cell data in an obese population: relationship with insulin, leptin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, sex hormone-binding globulin and sex hormonesActa Endocrinologica, 2000
- Abdominal adiposity values associated with established body mass indexes in white, black and hispanic Americans. A study from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Changes in patterns of fatness in adult men in relation to serum indices of cardiovascular risk: the Normative Aging StudyInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- The Use of Anthropometric and Dual‐Energy X‐ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Measures to Estimate Total Abdominal and Abdominal Visceral Fat in Men and WomenObesity Research, 1999
- Self-reported waist circumference compared with the ‘Waist Watcher’ tape-measure to identify individuals at increased health risk through intra-abdominal fat accumulationBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1998
- Insulin Sensitivity and Abdominal Obesity in African-American, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White Men and Women: The Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis StudyDiabetes, 1996
- Ratio of waist circumference to height is strong predictor of intra-abdominal fatBMJ, 1996
- Sex-specific Associations of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Intra-abdominal and Subcutaneous Fat Areas with Conventional Anthropometric Indices: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: Best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and womenThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Contribution of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to the impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism in human obesityMetabolism, 1987