The Evolution of Devolution: Labour‘s Home Rule Strategy in Opposition
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Government and Opposition
- Vol. 33 (4) , 479-496
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1998.tb00463.x
Abstract
THE LITERATURE ON CENTRAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO ETHNIC or peripheral demands suggests a continuum from meeting the challenge head on to conceding some or all of the demand. Strategies also have to be developed by parties in opposition. As the dominant party in Scotland, Labour found itself embroiled in the demand for constitutional change and having to respond in the 1980s. This created party management problems. The evolution of Labour's territorial strategy in opposition between 1979 and 1997 is important in understanding what it did after coming to power. The maintenance of support for Scottish home rule, the alterations in the policy and the method of implementing it can only be explained by understanding the evolution of the policy during the party's eighteen years out of office. During this time, there was a paradigm shift in Labour thinking which made devolution more likely when it came to power.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The British General Election of 1992, by David Butler and Dennis KavanaghPolitical Science Quarterly, 1993
- The British General Election of 1992Published by Springer Nature ,1992
- Ethnoterritorial Movements and the Policy Process: Accommodating Nationalist Demands in the Developed WorldComparative Politics, 1985
- The 40 Per Cent RuleParliamentary Affairs, 1980
- Labour and Scottish NationalismPublished by Springer Nature ,1979