Glial cell types, lineages, and response to injury in rat and fish: Implications for regeneration
- 1 March 1995
- Vol. 13 (3) , 157-165
- https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.440130302
Abstract
Axons of the mammalian central nervous system do not regenerate spontaneously after axonal injury, unlike the central nervous system axons of fish and amphibians and the peripheral nervous system of mammals, which possess a good regenerative ability (Grafstein: The Retina: A Model for Cell Biology Studies, Part II, 1986; Kiernan: Biol Rev 54:155–197, 1979; Murray: J Comp Neurol 168:175–196, 1976; Ramony Cajal: Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System, 1928; Reier and Webster: J Neurocytol 3:591–618, 1974; Sperry: Physiol Zool 23:351–361, 1948). It was previously believed that intrinsic differences between the central nervous system neurons of mammals and fish account for their differences in regenerative ability. The past decade, however, has seen an accumulation of evidence, indicating that mammalian central nervous system neurons are able to regenerate injured axons, at least to some extent. This was first demonstrated by Aguayo and colleagues (David and Aguayo: Science 214:931–933, 1981; Kierstead et al: Science 246:255–257, 1989), who showed that injured mammalian central nervous system axons can grow for a considerable distance into an autograft of a peripheral nerve. It was also demonstrated that injured rabbit optic axons can regenerate into their own environment (i.e., into the distal part of the injured optic nerve), if the injured nerve is treated so as to make it conducive for growth (Lavie et al: J Comp Neurol 298:293–314, 1990; Eitan et al: Science 264:1764–1768, 1994). It is generally believed today that the glial cells surrounding the axons play a crucial role in determining the regenerative capacity of any central nervous system. In this review, we discuss various aspects of glial cells in the context of regeneration, with special emphasis on similarities and differences between the glial cells of rat and fish optic nerves, representing a nonregenerative and a regenerative system, respectively.Keywords
This publication has 89 references indexed in Scilit:
- Presence of growth inhibitors in fish optic nerve myelin: Postinjury changesJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1994
- Temporal and spatial patterns of expression of laminin, chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan and HNK-1 immunoreactivity during regeneration in the goldfish optic nerveJournal of Neurocytology, 1992
- In vitro differentiation of trout oligodendrocytes: evidence for an A2B5-positive originDevelopmental Brain Research, 1992
- Characteristics of fish glial cells in culture: Possible implications as to their lineageGlia, 1992
- Retinal neurite growth on astrocytes is not modified by extracellular matrix, anti‐L1 antibody, or oligodendrocytesGlia, 1991
- Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) from goldfish: Its localisation in visual pathwayGlia, 1989
- Macrophages in the peripheral nervous system and astroglia in the central nervous system of rat commonly express apolipoprotein E during development but differ in their response to injuryNeuroscience Letters, 1986
- Adult rat brain astrocytes support survival of both NGF-dependent and NGF-insensitive neuronesNature, 1979
- The ultrastructure of astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia in the optic nerve of urodele amphibians (A. punctatum, T. pyrrhogaster, T. viridescens)Journal of Neurocytology, 1977
- Regeneration and remyelination ofXenopus tadpole optic nerve fibres following transection or crushJournal of Neurocytology, 1974