Identifying natural images from human brain activity
Top Cited Papers
- 5 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 452 (7185) , 352-355
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06713
Abstract
Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that, based on patterns of activity evoked by different categories of visual images, it is possible to deduce simple features in the visual scene, or to which category it belongs. Kay et al. take this approach a tantalizing step further. Their newly developed decoding method, based on quantitative receptive field models that characterize the relationship between visual stimuli and fMRI activity in early visual areas, can identify with high accuracy which specific natural image an observer saw, even for an image chosen at random from 1,000 distinct images. This prompts the thought that it may soon be possible to decode subjective perceptual experiences such as visual imagery and dreams, an idea previously restricted to the realm of science fiction. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that it is possible to deduce simple features in the visual scene or to which category it belongs. A decoding method based on quantitative receptive field models that characterize the relationship between visual stimuli and fMRI activity in early visual areas has now been developed. These models make it possible to identify, out of a large set of completely novel complex images, which specific image was seen by an observer. A challenging goal in neuroscience is to be able to read out, or decode, mental content from brain activity. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have decoded orientation1,2, position3 and object category4,5 from activity in visual cortex. However, these studies typically used relatively simple stimuli (for example, gratings) or images drawn from fixed categories (for example, faces, houses), and decoding was based on previous measurements of brain activity evoked by those same stimuli or categories. To overcome these limitations, here we develop a decoding method based on quantitative receptive-field models that characterize the relationship between visual stimuli and fMRI activity in early visual areas. These models describe the tuning of individual voxels for space, orientation and spatial frequency, and are estimated directly from responses evoked by natural images. We show that these receptive-field models make it possible to identify, from a large set of completely novel natural images, which specific image was seen by an observer. Identification is not a mere consequence of the retinotopic organization of visual areas; simpler receptive-field models that describe only spatial tuning yield much poorer identification performance. Our results suggest that it may soon be possible to reconstruct a picture of a person’s visual experience from measurements of brain activity alone.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortexPublished by Elsevier ,2007
- Inverse retinotopy: Inferring the visual content of images from brain activation patternsNeuroImage, 2006
- Decoding mental states from brain activity in humansNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2006
- Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brainNature Neuroscience, 2005
- Parametric reverse correlation reveals spatial linearity of retinotopic human V1 BOLD responseNeuroImage, 2004
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortexNeuroImage, 2003
- What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2002
- Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal CortexScience, 2001
- Reliable online human signature verification systemsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1996
- Borders of Multiple Visual Areas in Humans Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagingScience, 1995